by Bret

Sleepwalkers Update: Derived stats and the mana question

Carputations one and all. No, it doesn’t mean anything.

I’m not going to blarf on about PIPI and SUKI or whatever, you’ve all had a dose from your daily webcomics and online recyclopedias.

Obviously im against these stupid acts which wont even work as intended- they will make life hard for webmasters but not for pirates. D’oh!

One day piracy might be stopped. Do not be surprised. It’s a crime. I’d be well miffed if I spent a year making a masterpeice film and then everyone nicked it.

Having said that… ‘you wouldn’t steal a car, would you?’  – well, if i could do it anonymously by remote?!

 

Anyway. Update on Sleepwalkers.

Why? Who gives a darntoot about a half finished RPG?

Well, mainly its for my benefit- to pin down ideas and remind myself to keep working at it.

The latest conundriddle for me has been the derived statistics. Here’s how it is now:

 

Health – measures your health, innit. Incorporates both physical harm and ‘life force’, referred to as Aether in this setting. You get vampy-sucked by some kind of magical beastie, you lose Health.

Health is equal to the Brawn stat.

 

Concentration – measures how many simultaneous acts of magic or intense physical gubbins you can do. You want to enact a Word (er, basically a spell) and use your innate powers? Use concentration ‘slots’.

Concentration is one third of the Brain stat.

 

Right. The problem is that each character type gets a bonus to a stat- Brawn, Brain, Bearing and Balance. Therefore two of the character types automatically get a bonus to the derived stats above and two do not.

No fair!

So I either had to add Bearing and Balance to the above, which didnt seem right, or add two new derived stats so that were would be one for each.

I went with the latter, but I’m still deciding exactly what to do.

Brawn makes Health- fine.

Brain makes Concentration – fine. Probably needs a new name. Might make it equal to Brain rather than a third and then make more complex magic require more than one slot.

 

Balance. I’d like to add in a version of the fate points used by many games, so I thought Balance, being the stat that covers luck, speed and overall ability, could link to a Prowess derived stat.

That means that the player could spend Prowess points (or whatever) to get them out of a scrape, simply representing their character’s ability to pull a herculean feat (or crafty bit of luck) out of the proverbial bag. Points would have to be exhaustible. Maybe call it Luck, not sure- want it to reflect their ability, more than fate’s hand.

 

Finally, Bearing. This stat represents a person’s force of will and their general interaction with the world- a kind of measure of their character.

Now, the mana question.

I have been toying relentlessly with the idea of attaching Bearing to a derived Aether stat.

Whoah, bessie! That would mean that a character has both Health and Aether.

RPG vets and fantasy fans will immediately recognise Health and Mana, HP and MP.

I was torn by this. It’s so very fantasy! Not quite the right vibe for Sleepwalkers. On the other hand, Health would be free to represent purely physical damage to a character and Aether could handle magical drains and be used instead of Health for fuelling spells that require sacrifice.

 

That would also require huge rewriting. Strays transfer Health all over the place- now they would be doing Aether, or both. Concentration slots wouldnt really be needed if each magical act had an attached Aether cost. On the other hand, it would solve a problem I have with Health being a mashup of physical wounds and internal drains of vitality.

 

At the end of the day, I’m leaning away from an Aether stat. It doesn’t quite feel right for Sleepwalkers. It would be nice to let characters who aren’t brawny have more Health available for fuelling magic, but I feel that at the end of the day a combined Health makes players take such sacrifices more seriously. Generally speaking, Health can be gained in plenty of other ways.

 

Instead I’m toying with a Fortitude stat to go with Bearing. A simply measure of the strength of a character’s character, a kind of Health score for the persona. Fortitude would be whittled down when players encounter terrifying occult shit, or killing enemies. Essentially a measure of their mental tolerance (but under Bearing instead of Brain because its about the person, not their ability to think). Fortitude could possibly be ‘spent’ at  times to assert an effort of willpower. Lose Fortitude, start to go crazy or lose nerve. Modern occult games should always take into account the shock that the supernatural has on a person and this would be a way to do it.

Well, I’ll keep thinking. I keep hovering back to having an Aether stat. What do people think? Seperate body health and ‘life force’? Or keep them as one and have a measure of coping-with-scary?

 

Peace, Wordy Beardsmith.

 

[sociable]

THQ announces South Park The Game!

A’ernoon. So, a new south park game!

Previous attempts havent really done much for me- however as a huge fan of the series, I’m looking forward to a new attempt. It appears to feature the boys acting out a fantasy scenario (remember the one with the Lord of the Rings and the blue movie?) which should be full of my favourite brand of reference humour.

This was said:

THQ today announced that they are collaborating with South Park Digital Studios LLC, the joint venture between “South Park” creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker and Viacom Media Networks and Obsidian Entertainment, Inc. to develop the next chapter in South Park entertainment: “South Park: The Game.”

“South Park: The Game” is an epic role-playing adventure that will allow the user to befriend Stan, Kyle, Cartman and Kenny and explore the quiet little mountain town like never before.

“Our goal is simple: to put creative talent first,” said Danny Bilson, EVP Core Games, THQ. “Matt and Trey are arguably two of the most important comedic talents of their generation.  Bringing their vision of South Park to the interactive space is a dream-come-true.”

The first details of “South Park: The Game” will be revealed in the exclusive cover story in Game Informer®‘s January issue, shipping to subscribers in early December 2011.

“South Park: The Game” is scheduled to be available for the PlayStation®3 computer entertainment system, the Xbox 360® video game and entertainment system from Microsoft, and Windows PC in the second half of calendar 2012.

 
[sociable]

The Healthening – 13/01/12

Evening all! Fancy another glimpse into the hallowed British Health Foundation weight loss tome?

“The best thing about the front of the booklet is the BHF logo. You immediately know it’s going to be sensible.”

– 39 year old overweight woman

Yes, sensible, like Vinnie Jones teaching CPR to the tune of Staying Alive. Thanks, overweight woman. Also, you need a better superhero name.

 

Welcome to the second week of my personal battle against weight. I doubt that these updates will be weekly in future, but I thought I should say how things are going so far.

I admit to a certain level of laziness- I’m a casual man, a laid back guy. That’s probably the main cause of my overweight status and lack of fitness. That and the noms. That in mind, it will be of no surprise that I haven’t set up any kind of training regimen yet.

As I said, I intend to sort out diet first and that won’t be a sudden shift. I intend to stay true to myself, which means maintaining a certain sedentary style in my daily life. I want other lazy gits to take something away from my efforts. See how the words ‘take away’ slip in unbidden.

Point is, I haven’t joined any gyms yet. I will be speaking to a pal of mine about some vague fitness training, but so far walking has been my new friend. Once I’ve lost some weight, I can look at bigger and better things.

What I have been doing is keeping a food diary. I’ve tried to keep this in line with the BHF grimoire but that has been a little difficult. Honestly, I’ve mostly just tried to watch my calorie limit, with the help of my nifty app, myfitnesspal.

My heart sank when I saw how little emphasis is placed on meat. I love meat. I could eat meat and meat alone. I knew this day would come, but that doesn’t make it any easier. Fruit and veg are the new kids on the block, or in this case, the plate. Bleh, ack, and poop.

BHF and my nurse man recommended eating between 1,500 and 1,800 calories per day. I’ve gone with 1,410 based on the calculations of my app. I know I risk having an angry Vinnie Jones banging on the door, but it worked out a decent rate of loss and at the moment I don’t get a great deal of exercise, what with working at home on a chair. BHF breaks it down into 8 or more portions of fruityveg, 8 portions of bread-like, 2 portions of dairy, 3 portions of meaty protein, 3 portions of spread fat butter things and up to 200 kcal of high fat or high sugar foods and alcohol.

Beesus, that’s a lot to remember. Well, I drink rarely, in hedonistic bursts, so that won’t be an issue for a while. As for the others, the BHF portion is not the amount it sounds like. Usually it means a small amount that can be measured by eye or hand (such as one handful of small fruits like grapes). So the high numbers of portions actually mean several small portions, which allows you to mix things up and measure them without weighing everything you eat and writing down the calories.

What did I do? Weighed everything I ate and counted the calories. I’m strange like that. What I might do is look more closely at BHF’s nice and easy method once I get bored of all the maths.

So, here’s a typical day in my food diary:

 

Breakfast

Crownfield’s Choco Rice. Uhoh! This isn’t healthy food. I’m so crap! Thing is, I hate wasting food, so I’m eating a few things like this to get rid of them before buying more. Milk on top.

BHF portion-o-meter: 2 portions of bread-like (6 tablespoons of cereal!), 1 portion of milk.

Calorie-o-meter: 158

 

Lunch

Mission Deli garlic wrap of yumminess! Normally two of these, just had one. Just one! No wonder I feel like gnawing the skin off my arm. 20 grams of medium cheddar. 4 slices of ham from generic ASDA reformed ham (ham that used to be really bad but has seen the error of its ways). Oh, and 16 pringles- again, for the purpose of getting rid of the damn things.

BHF portion-o-meter: 1 portion of bread-like (wraps weren’t on there, used pitta as guide), 1 portion of dairy, 1 portion of meat, 75 kcals of crisp (half of my allotted high fat stuff).

Calorie-o-meter: 490

 

Dinner

Slightly more diet-like here. Salmon. I love salmon, but it comes in such frustratingly small amounts! Mouth sized! About as stomach-filling as a sudden gust of wind. Things look up with the addition of Philadelphia (not quite cheese) and some potato wedges (not quite chips). Things look down again with the addition of baby carrots and peas. I can eat them if I mulch them into the other foodstuffs.

BHF portion-o-meter: 3 portions of bread-like (No wedges or chips on there, which admittedly makes sense, so I equated it to ‘six egg-sized potatoes’), 1 portion of meat (fish, white, cooked), 4 portions of veg (12 heaped tablespoons, though you try measuring carrots by the tablespoonful), 1 portion of dairy (low fat spread gubbins, I actually had half a portion- 30g instead of 80).

Calorie-o-meter: 409

 

Snacks

Drinks, which were three cups of tea and some diluted blackcurrant nonsense. Couldn’t be bothered to work out how much milk I used and whether it constituted a BHF portion. Still can’t. No coke! ASDA apple and grape baggy. Quite nice actually. There, I said it. No bananas yet. Don’t trust ‘em.

BHF portion-o-meter: 1 portion of fruit, 48 kcals of sugar (three teaspoons).

Calorie-o-meter: 200

 

Therefore, in total, I done eaten this:

BHF: 5 out of 8 portions of fruityveg (fail, but that was expected!)

6 of my 8 portion limit of bread-like (win)

3 of my 2 portions of dairy (one was a half portion but I didn’t count milk in tea- fail)

2 of my 3 portions of meaty protein (win, but at what cost?)

0 of my 3 portions of spread fat butter things (because I had no toast today – win)

123 of my 200 kcal limit of high fat crap (win!)

Calories: 1,257 out of 1, 410 (winny winnerson)

 

Well, most days went more or less like this. Frankly, the BHF method seems easier, but it means a fair bit of meal planning and learning to use by habit. Clearly I failed on some counts where I could have perhaps had buttery toast for breakfast instead of milky cereal and been fine. I will be putting it aside for now but trying to take on board the proportions it proposes in its portions. She sells sea shells… anyway, calorie-wise I did fine. So far I haven’t breached my limit once.

On the other hand, I’ve been hungry all the damn time, never quite satisfied by meals. I hate it, but really can’t complain. I’ve had it too good for too long.

Also, I will soon be replacing these things with their low fat equivalents- particularly cheese and wraps. Weight Watchers do small wraps with a suspiciously low 98 cals! Once this is achieved, I can have a little more to eat. Can I also manage 5 fruit and veg a day? Unlikely!

 

The weigh-in.

Despite it being me, I have good news!

Weight at week two: 15 stone, 8 pounds (218 pounds)

A loss of 6 pounds!

Not counting flesh gnawed from arm.

 
[sociable]